31
In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the company’s ability
to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using
the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the company or
to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole
are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report
that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee
that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement
when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually
or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users
taken on the basis of these financial statements.
Explanation as to what extent the audit was considered capable of detecting irregularities,
including fraud
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design
procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect irregularities, including fraud.
The risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting
one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery or
intentional misrepresentations, or through collusion. The extent to which our procedures are capable
of detecting irregularities, including fraud is detailed below.
However, the primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of fraud rests with both those
charged with governance of the company and management.
• We obtained an understanding of the legal and regulatory frameworks that are applicable to
the company and determined that the most significant are:
o UK adopted international accounting standards
o Tax Legislation (governed by HM Revenue and Customs)
o Companies Act 2006
o Listing requirements of the London Stock Exchange
• We understood how Wessex Water Services Finance Plc is complying with those frameworks
by reading internal policies and codes of conduct and assessing the entity level control
environment, including the level of oversight of those charged with governance. As the
Company’s management is the same as WWSL, we made enquiries of the legal counsel and
internal audit, at WWSL, of known instances of non-compliance or suspected non-compliance
with laws and regulations of the UK ultimate parent company and all its subsidiaries. We
corroborated our enquiries through review of correspondence with regulatory bodies.
• We assessed the susceptibility of the company’s financial statements to material
misstatement, including how fraud might occur by making enquiries of senior management.
We planned our audit to identify risks of management override, and performed audit
procedures to address the potential for management bias, particularly over areas involving
significant estimation and judgement, in particular the expected credit loss provision on
amounts due from parent undertaking.
• Based on this understanding we designed our audit procedures to identify non-compliance
with such laws and regulations. Our procedures involved enquiries of key management and
legal counsel, reviewing key policies, inspecting legal registers and correspondence with
regulators and reading key management meeting minutes. We also completed procedures to
conclude on the compliance of significant disclosures in the Annual Report and Financial
Statements with the requirements of the relevant accounting standards and UK legislation.